Who is accountable for such a poor answer on School protection?


The Parliamentary Liaison Committee met on Wednesday for the first time for twelve months and it involved two consistent people throughout the 90 minute session with a small group of others who made short contributions throughout. The Chairperson and the Prime Minister were the two who were involved throughout, and for around 75 minutes a third person who is a Chair of one of a number of Select Committees was also involved in asking questions to challenge Johnson. The decision to use this Committee to scrutinise Prime Ministers began in 2002 and in 2010 it was set out that the Chair of the Select Committees would be determined by Parliament rather than the Government. However up until last week the Chair of the Liaison Committee was decided by the other Select Committee Chairs. Last week Boris Johnson proposed that the Chair would be Bernard Jenkins and this decision was agreed by most of the Conservative MPs in the current Parliament.. Let us hope that in the future it will be reversed and the Chair of the Liaison Committee will go back to the Committee members, rather than the Prime Minister.

The questions about Schooling were all made by Robert Halfon who is the Chair of Education Committee and because of the way in which the committee worked on this occasion, none of the other people were invited to raise supplementary questions and given that each person had a limited time, very few went beyond their own Committee requirements. So the question from Robert was only raised by him and only he and Bernard could have repeated the question (as a few others did on their subjects) if they were concerned that Johnson did not answer the question adequately. Robert had three questions and this was the first of them, but arguably it was the most critical and it was the one that was ignored most significantly:

Can you assure all those parents, children, teachers and sports staff who are watching today that the phase school opening on the 1st June is absolutely safe, is of minimal risk and that all the required testing, tracking and tracing will be given to teacher staff and pupils and there will be the required PPE where it is needed and is it still the Government plan to have all the primary school years going back a month before the Summer Holidays?

The answer that came from Boris Johnson did not respond in an effective manner to any of the critical points and if I was a parent of a Primary School pupil, I would have real concerns about sending a child to School on Monday:

OK Rob well there are some very important questions, just to remind everybody because not everybody will have clocked this yet, what we want from June 1st is for Primary Schools to begin  gradually to go back so Early years, Reception, Year One and Year Six. We know we can do it in a safe socially distanced way, that’s what we want. We accept that not everybody will necessarily go back on day one but we do expect people to return to school in those class groups. We do believe it’s safe, provided, provided, everybody remembers the guidelines that we have set out and everybody understands the crucial things you’ve got to do particularly maintaining social distance and washing your hands and of course self-isolating if you’ve got symptoms. Those are the absolutely crucial things that you’ve got to do, they can’t be stressed often enough and on your point about the rest of Primary Schools Rob we want to keep that under review we’d like to do it if we can it depends on our national success in keeping the disease under control and driving that incidence down and so we will continue to review it in accordance with the scientific advice.

It would be fascinating if this question and answer were measured by OFQAL or OFSTED and what % of answer this would be judged by. However sadly and it was very disturbing, neither Robet Halfon, nor Bernard Jenking chose to raise their concerns. Of course it is very useful that the answer is in public, but if parents, pupils and staff have seen this, they may well be rather unhappy with this response. I certainly am.

About ianchisnall

I am passionate about the need for public policies to be made accessible to everyone, especially those who want to improve the wellbeing of their communities. I am particularly interested in issues related to crime and policing as well as health services and strategic planning.
This entry was posted in Education, Parliament and Democracy, Youth Issues and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Who is accountable for such a poor answer on School protection?

  1. Rob Furber says:

    I’m not going to say anymore than you already have because we BOTH know that on any issue the response is waffle and hyperbole, fed by one of the laziest and indolent work pattern in a premiere we’ve ever had.

    I found it telling that Bernard Jenkin (whom I really though twas a ‘stooge’ remarked at the end of it the most credible and reassuring answer given by the Prime Minister in that session were the ones that he admitted he was uncertain about and would have to consult officials and colleagues and pen a written response for completeness.

    • ianchisnall says:

      I do agree that Jenkins did behave reasonably well on many of the elements, however I felt this was one of the questions that should have been dealt with a bit more robustly. That said having chaired many meetings, it is not easy to get everything correct.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s