As I have written previously, the desire by Central Government to devolve decision making and funding to local groups of Councils is essentially a good one and something that all residents should be involved in. It has the potential to help to address the rather tired rhetoric of English Votes for English Laws (EVEL) which most MPs want to reserve for themselves. On Thursday 14th January Communities Minister Baroness Williams held a discussion on how best to devolve Government decision making and funding to Surrey and Sussex with the leaders of 3 County Councils, 3 District Councils and the Chairman of the Capital to Coast local enterprise partnership. The meeting focused on how these Councils will work together to help tackle the congested road and rail network, pioneer new digital technology, close the skills gap that is holding businesses back and build new affordable homes. The group were speaking on behalf of 44 organisations including all of the other District and Borough Councils in Sussex and Surrey, the Fire and Rescue Services and Police Services for Surrey and Sussex. The wider group is known as 3SC Devolution which focuses on vital issues for all residents of Sussex including the 270,000 people in Brighton and Hove, however our democratic voice is missing from this important group. This is clearly an odd state of affairs, any work to improve transport and technology gaps in Sussex does not make sense without Brighton and Hove being actively engaged. To be fair this is not the only discussion taking place on matters of devolution in Sussex, a group called the Greater Brighton Economic Area which involves some other Councils is also active. However, Brighton and Hove is the only Council that has chosen not to be part of the larger group, and the other Councils involved in the Greater Brighton group are members of both groups as we should be. This is a mistake, just as it is a tragedy that the themes adopted by 3SC do not extend to matters of social inclusion, particularly in the context of an area that has a large rural population and overlook the need for an environmental focus. In order to achieve this broader set of priorities, the voice of the voluntary and community sector needs to be included. Sadly the 44 organisations are all statutory or business led agencies, not a single voluntary sector agency is part of the mix.
If you find any of these posts relevant to some of the social or political issues of the moment do leave a comment or contact me directly (click on my photo for my contact details)
Blog Stats
- 102,035 hits
-
Join 86 other subscribers
-
Recent Posts
Archives
Top Rated
Categories
- Afghanistan (27)
- Brighton & Hove (856)
- Casey Review (5)
- Charities (526)
- Church Teaching (232)
- Community Safety (289)
- Data Retention and Investigatory Powers (17)
- Deaf & Hard of Hearing (62)
- Economics (556)
- Education (487)
- Environment (222)
- EU Referendum (554)
- Health Reform (137)
- Housing (87)
- Immigration (126)
- Journalism (130)
- Justice Issues (221)
- Lobbying Bill (65)
- Network Rail (64)
- Obituary (22)
- Parliament and Democracy (3,659)
- Phone Hacking (7)
- Planning Rules (57)
- Police & Crime Commissioner (207)
- Policing (412)
- Scottish Referendum (23)
- STEM (68)
- Syria (90)
- Think Tanks (15)
- UK Riots in August 2011 (15)
- Ukraine (17)
- Uncategorized (61)
- Welfare Reform (72)
- Yemen (44)
- Youth Issues (499)
Twitter Updates
Tweets by IanChisnall- Amber Rudd
- Andrew Griffith
- Boris Johnson
- Brexit
- Brighton & Hove
- Brighton & Hove City Council
- C-19
- Caroline Ansell
- Caroline Lucas
- Charities
- Charity Commission
- Charity Commission for England and Wales
- Chris Grayling
- Conservative Party
- Coronavirus
- COVID-19
- Daniel Hannan
- David Cameron
- David Davis
- Department for Education
- Donald Trump
- e-petition
- Eric Pickles
- EU Referendum
- European Union
- FareShare
- Foodbanks
- George Osborne
- Gillian Keegan
- Government
- Green Party
- Henry Smith
- Home Office
- House of Commons
- House of Lords
- Huw Merriman
- Iain Duncan Smith
- Independent Candidates
- Jacob Rees-Mogg
- Jeremy Corbyn
- Jeremy Hunt
- Jeremy Quin
- Katy Bourne
- Keir Starmer
- Labour Party
- Lib Dem Party
- Liz Truss
- Lloyd Russell-Moyle
- Lobbying Bill
- Maria Caulfield
- Matthew Hancock
- Member of Parliament
- Michael Gove
- MPs
- NHS
- Nick Gibb
- Nigel Farage
- Nusrat Ghani
- Parliament
- Peter Bottomley
- Peter Kyle
- Police and Crime Commissioner
- Priti Patel
- Rishi Sunak
- Sajid Javid MP
- Sally-Ann Hart
- Small Businesses
- SME
- Steve Bassam
- Sussex
- Sussex Police
- Syria
- Theresa May
- Tim Loughton
- UKIP

Ian is right, both in that B&H is not properly in 3SC (why is this?) and that there is no strategic Voluntary sector or democratic involvement in 3SC development, which is a major weakness if the 3SC Devolution stated priority of public service transformation is to be achieved. If the most likely providers and recipients of transformed public services are not involved in developing the strategy, history conclusively shows that the strategy will be weak…
Thanks for the positive response